Legal Opinion

Jorge Antonio Sandoval v. New Line Cinema Corp., New Line Productions, Inc. And New Line Distribution, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 24, 1998No. Docket 97-9175PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TELESCA, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Jorge Antonio Sandoval appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sidney H. Stein, Judge) granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Sandoval’s copyright infringement action. Sandoval brought suit claiming that the defendants, producers and distributors of the motion picture “Seven,” used ten of his copyrighted photographs in that movie without his permission. Because we hold that defendant’s use of Sandoval’s pictures was de min-imis, we affirm, the judgment of the District…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Faith Ringgold v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc., Home Box Office, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. Sandoval v. New Line Cinema Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Tufamerica, Inc. v. DiamondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Gottlieb Development LLC v. Paramount Pictures Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. Newton v. DiamondDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Lewinson v. HENRY HOLT AND CO., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API