Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 7, 1994No. 92-1292PublishedCited by 624 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter

We are called upon to decide whether 2 Live Crew’s commercial parody of Roy Orbison’s song, “Oh, Pretty Woman,” *572may be a fair use within the meaning of the Copyright Act of 1976,17 U. S. C. § 107 (1988 ed. and Supp. IV). Although the District Court granted summary judgment for 2 Live Crew, the Court of Appeals reversed, holding the defense of fair use barred by the song’s commercial character and excessive borrowing. Because we hold that a parody’s commercial character is only one element to be weighed in a fair use enquiry, and that insufficient consideration was given to the nature of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Stewart v. AbendSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by624 opinions

  1. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Salinger v. ColtingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Brownmark Films, LLC v. Comedy PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

619 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API