Newton v. Diamond
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MANELLA, District Judge.
1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
The Beastie Boys, an alternative rock and hip-hop band, and their business asso- dates (“Defendants”) sampled a six-second, three-note sequence of a flute composition composed and performed by James W. Newton, Jr. (“Plaintiff’). Plaintiff concedes that Defendants licensed the sound recording of his work, but alleges that Defendants’ use of the sample infringed upon the underlying musical composition. Both parties have filed motions for summary…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Neil Gaiman and Marvels and Miracles, Llc, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Todd McFarlane Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Johnson v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Newton v. DiamondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Tufamerica, Inc. v. DiamondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. Westbound Records, Inc., Southfield Music, Inc. Nine Records, Inc. v. Dimension Films Miramax Film Corp., No Limit Films Llc, Bridgeport Music, Inc. Southfield Music, Inc. Nine Records, Inc., Westbound Records, Inc. v. Dimension Films, No Limit Films LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.