Legal Opinion
Dozier-Nix v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-593 (RWR)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Pamela Dozier-Nix brings this action against her employer, the District of Columbia, alleging employment discrimination based on sex and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The District of Columbia has moved for summary judgment. Because the District has not shown that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on either count of Dozier-Nix’s complaint, the motion for summary judgment will be denied.
BACKGROUND
Dozier-Nix and her husband are employed by the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, AlbertoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hairston v. BoardmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Payne v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Russell v. Harman International Industries, IncorporatedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Banks v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. Science Applications International CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.