Legal Opinion
Russell v. Harman International Industries, Incorporated
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 22, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2007-2212PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Patrick Russell, a participant in the Harman Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) established by Harman International Industries, Incorporated (“Harman”), brings on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated this putative class action against Harman, Dr. Sidney Harman, Sandra Buchanan, Kevin Brown, Gregory Henry, Chet Simon, Jeffrey Curtis, Robert Ryan, the Harman Administrative Committee, the Harman Investment Committee, the Harman Pension Committee, and unknown fiduciary defendants 1-10, seeking damages and…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Russell v. Harman International Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- McKinney v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Copeland v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Keister v. Aarp Benefits CommitteeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.