Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Insurance Commissioner

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 11, 1984No. 881, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

We have before us a dispute between Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York corporation (Metropolitan), and the State Insurance Commissioner over the amount of premium tax due by Metropolitan for 1971. The dispute arises from a difference of opinion concerning the application of Maryland’s “retaliatory” premium tax (Md.Code Ann. art. 48A, § 61(1)). Metropolitan contends that one part of the tax statute — the last sentence of § 61(1) — is unconstitutional because of vagueness and because it improperly delegates legislative authority to the Commissioner.

The Maryland Tax…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Beretta U.S.A. Corp. v. SantosCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API