Legal Opinion
Abrahamson v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 12, 1929No. 26,944PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for judgment or for a new trial.
Plaintiffs are residents or live. in the vicinity of Pitt railway station in Lake of the Woods county, Minnesota, and are affected by the order of the railroad and warehouse commission hereinafter referred to. The defendant is a common carrier for hire of freight and passengers by means of railroad transportation, operating principally in the Dominion of Canada and incorporated under its laws. It operates 31 miles of railroad in Roseau and Lake of the Woods counties in this state and serves seven stations…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Steenerson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State v. HovorkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. VerschingelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- State and R. R. W. H. Comm. v. M. St. L. R. R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Twin City Motor Bus Co. v. RechtzigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.