Legal Opinion
State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 29, 1946No. 34,093PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
These proceedings were instituted by the filing of two separate verified complaints with the railroad and warehouse commission, one by the Port Authority of Saint Paul (a municipal commission created under the harbor act, L. 1929, c. 61, as amended by L. 1931, c. 132, Minn. St. 1941, § 458.09 [Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 1372-7%]), and one by the state through the attorney general. The complaints both alleged in substance that certain switching charges for carload traffic switched from the property of said Port Authority to industries in the St. Paul Switching District…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Arkadelphia Co. v. St. Louis SW Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Porter v. Investors SyndicateSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- City of Iowa City v. Muscatine Development Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.