Legal Opinion

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Verschingel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1936No. 30,779PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 268 N.W. 2, 709. The appeals are from orders of the district court denying the motions of appellants to vacate its findings and orders affirming the orders of the railroad and warehouse commission granting each respondent a certificate of public necessity the convenience to operate trucks between fixed termini, and grant a new trial. The appeals to the district court were submitted upon the evidence taken before the commission, except as to the value of the services of respondents' attorneys in the appeal.

The assignments of error are: (1) That the court erred in determining that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State of Florida v. United States Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. Same. Wilson Lumber Co. Of Florida v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Wabash, Chester & Western Railroad v. Commerce Commission ex rel. Jefferson Southwestern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Canton-East Liverpool Coach Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Mulcahy v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Propper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Gore v. JohnWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Muirhead v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API