Legal Opinion
State and R. R. W. H. Comm. v. M. St. L. R. R.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1941No. Nos. 32,633, 32,634, 32,636, 32,637, 32,836, 32,837, 32,838, 32,839PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 297 N.W. 189. The receiver of the Minneapolis St. Louis Railroad Company applied to the railroad and warehouse commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under L. 1925, c. 185 (1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, §§ 5015-1 to 5015-19), authorizing the railroad to operate as an auto transportation company over certain public highways which run parallel to its lines. The proposed operation was for the transportation of freight in less than carload lots by motor truck serving approximately 27 communities on the railroad's lines. One of these lines extended westerly from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Steenerson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Brazil v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Canton-East Liverpool Coach Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- N.Y. C. Rd. Co. v. P. U. C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Clintonville Transfer Line, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- State v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Mixed Local of Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union Local No. 458 v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees International Alliance & Bartenders International League of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Twin City Motor Bus Co. v. RechtzigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.