Advocates for Effective Regulation v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
At issue in this case is the validity of the City of Eugene “Right to Know Initiative” (Initiative), a voter-approved charter amendment that imposes fees and reporting requirements on users of hazardous substances. The trial court upheld the Initiative, and plaintiffs, a number of businesses subject to the Initiative, appealed. We concluded that three articles of the Initiative are invalid and remanded to the trial court to determine whether those invalid articles are severable from the Initiative. Advocates for Effective Regulation v. City of Eugene, 160 Or App 292, 981 P2d 368 (1999).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Qwest Corp. v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Childers Meat Co. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019