Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1960PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This appeal tests the constitutionality of the Oregon obscenity statute, ORS 167.150. On March 31, 1958, the grand jury for Lane County returned an indictment charging the defendant with a violation of the act, reciting that he did “wilfully and unlawfully sell, distribute and possess with intent to sell and distribute” a book entitled “The Strange Three.” The indictment describes the book as follows:

“* * * said book as an entirety being indecent and obscene, tending to incite lascivious thoughts and tending to arouse lustful desires * * * ??

It will be noticed that the indictment charges that…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. State v. TourtillottOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Willing v. MazzoconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. State v. CiancanelliOregon Supreme Court · 2005

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API