Legal Opinion
McGahey v. Harvard University Flexible Benefits Plan
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 19, 2010No. Civil Action 08-10435-RGSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
STEARNS, District Judge.
On December 11, 2009, this court found that defendants Harvard University Flexible Benefits Plan and Harvard University as the Plan Administrator (collectively Harvard), wrongfully terminated Rosemary McGahey’s long-term disability benefits. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1), McGahey also sought attorney fees and costs. The court in its decision signaled that a fee award in McGahey’s case “may be appropriate.” The court invited McGahey to file a petition for an award, which she did on February 1, 2010.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- William Weinberger v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Gay Officers Action League v. Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Wanda Glenn v. Metlife (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) and Long Term Disability Plan for Associates of Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rogers v. CofieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- International Union of Operating Engineers v. Ray Haluch Gravel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Merigan v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Showtime Entertainment LLC v. AmmendoliaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- K.D. v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023