Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Cofield
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 31, 2013No. Civil Action No. 08-10684-MBBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF LIONEL ROGERS’ FEE APPLICATION (DOCKET ENTRY #56); PLAINTIFF LIONEL ROGERS’ SUPPLEMENTAL FEE APPLICATION (DOCKET ENTRY # 78); PLAINTIFF LIONEL ROGERS’ SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FEE APPLICATION (DOCKET ENTRY # 83) .
BOWLER, United States Magistrate ■ Judge.
Pending before this court is a motion for attorneys’ fees filed by plaintiff Lionel *357Rogers (“plaintiff’) and two supplemental motions to recover reasonable fees incurred after the filing of the original motion. (Docket Entry ## 56, 78 & 83). After a four day trial, the jury awarded plaintiff $101,188.30 in this…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Castaneda Castillo v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Norkunas v. HPT Cambridge, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Roggio v. GrasmuckDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Alston v. Town of BrooklineDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.