International Union of Operating Engineers v. Ray Haluch Gravel Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES (Dkt. No. 69)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Following a three-day bench trial in this ERISA action, the court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $26,897.41. In addition to this damage award, Plaintiffs seek attorneys’ fees and costs of $143,600.44. (Dkt. No. 69.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will allow fees, but at a level substantially below the requested amount.
II. DISCUSSION
Section 1132 states that in any successful action to recover delinquent contributions under ERISA, “the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- William Weinberger v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Torres-Rivera v. O'Neill-CancelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Lewis v. KendrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of the Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs & Participating Emp'rsSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers & Participating Employers v. Ray Haluch Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers & Participating Employers v. Ray Haluch Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Merigan v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Gross v. Sun Life Assurance Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015