Cotton v. Morck Hotel Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
This action was instituted by B. Floyd Cotton, individually, and Robert Cotton, by B. Floyd Cotton, his guardian ad litem, against the Morck Hotel Company, a corporation, and William V. Appel, defendants.
The defendants demurred to the complaint, as amended pursuant to stipulation of the parties, and, after argument, the trial court filed its memorandum decision, stating that the demurrer should be sustained, upon the ground that the amended complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Later, a formal order sustaining the demurrer was entered, followed by an…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. LeonidasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steele v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
- Puget Mill Co. v. DuecyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- McHenry v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re Johnson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1936
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maddox v. River & Sea Marine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Mill & Logging Supply Co. v. West Tenino Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Slater v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Wilkinson v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Creech v. WebberWashington Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.