Legal Opinion

Slater v. Bird

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1952No. 32060PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

Joseph E. Netzel and wife borrowed approximately twenty-four hundred dollars from the plaintiffs, with which to buy an equity in a house upon which the United Mutual Savings Bank of Tacoma had a first mortgage. The Netzels gave the plaintiffs a second mortgage to secure the loan.

Thereafter, Hill R. Anthony brought a tort action and took a default judgment against the Netzels in the amount of $7,223.30. The Netzels, being insolvent and unable to meet any of their obligations to any of the parties mentioned herein, and being in arrears in their payments on the mortgages, sold the house to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Puget Mill Co. v. DuecyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McMahan v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Cotton v. Morck Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Mill & Logging Supply Co. v. West Tenino Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API