Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1952No. 31808PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an action for damages against Harry R. Gould and wife and the city of Tacoma. Defendant city demurred to the amended complaint on the ground that the *879complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained. The city was dismissed from the action, and plaintiffs have appealed.

The amended complaint alleges that plaintiff Sinclair was driving a car owned by plaintiff Wilkinson, in which the other plaintiffs were riding as guests; that a collision occurred with a truck owned by the city; that the truck was being driven by defendant Gould…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. McMahan v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Marshall v. Estate of ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cotton v. Morck Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yelle v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Yelle v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API