In Re Estate of Friedman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco allowing attorney fees for services in probate proceeding. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the superior court allowing to Marshall B. Woodworth and Edmund Tauszky, each respectively, the sum of five thousand dollars out of the funds of the estate of said decedent, for certain services found to have been rendered by them as attorneys.
Julius Friedman died prior to April, 1900. His will was duly admitted to probate, and the estate has been in the course of administration for many years. Edward R. Lande and I. M. Friedberg have been, during all that time, the executors of said estate. By the terms of the will the residue of the estate was given to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In Re Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Thomas v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In re Estate of ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- In re JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by18 opinions
- Murphey v. American Jewish CongressCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Estate of FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Layous v. Monterey County Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- In Re the Estate of ParsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.