Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Hosselkus

California Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1902No. Sac. No. 858PublishedCited by 47 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The appellant filed a petition in the supe-

rior court for the removal of the respondent from the office of administrator of the estate of the above-named decedent and for the revocation- of his letters of administration, upon the ground that he had mismanaged the estate and neglected his duty as administrator thereof, setting forth in her petition, as the facts upon which she made her charges, that he had allowed one Ulty McCabe to take from the property of the estate thirteen head of cattle, and had not sought to regain them; that he had neglected to collect the amount of a note of George F.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Jones v. LamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Roach v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API