Legal Opinion
Estate of Friedman
California Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1918No. S. F. No. 7796. In BankPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an appeal from a decree in a proceeding under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, determining the rights of all persons claiming to be heirs, or entitled to distribution. For convenience, appellants now before this court are designated as the "Kagan claimants."
The deceased left the bulk of his property by will to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- James v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Estate of EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Goldner v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Branford Baptist Church v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Market Street Railway Co. v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.