SAIF Corp. v. Allen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*185LEESON, J.
SAIF and Rose’s Restaurant seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board determining that claimant is entitled to attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1) for having prevailed on the question of entitlement to compensation for medical bills related to a compensable claim. We conclude that the Board erred in assessing attorney fees, and reverse in part.
Claimant sustained a compensable back injury in 1988 while working as a waitress for Nendel’s. In 1989, she sustained another back injury while working for Rose’s Restaurant, SAIF’s insured. The insurers agreed that the injury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Shoulders v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Jones v. Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Short v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- O'NEAL v. TewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Karl v. Construction Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- SAIF Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Bailey v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Gamble v. Nelson InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.