Legal Opinion

Karl v. Construction Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 4, 1995No. 92-04048; CA A82608PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that he is not entitled to an award of insurer-paid attorney fees for having prevailed on a claim for medical treatment. We conclude that claimant is entitled to attorney fees under SAIF v. Allen, 320 Or 192, 881 P2d 773 (1994), and reverse and remand.

Claimant injured both knees in April, 1990, while employed at Construction Equipment Company. His claim was accepted and closed by a determination order in October, 1990, with an award of permanent partial disability.

After claim closure, claimant suffered increased pain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. SAIF Corp. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API