Legal Opinion
Short v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1988No. A8606-03219; CA A41221; SC S34725PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, C. J.
Like its companion cases of Greenslitt v. City of Lake Oswego, 305 Or 530, 754 P2d 570 (1988), and Guill v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, 305 Or 538, 754 P2d 574 (1988), both decided this date, this case concerns the award of attorney fees in a workers’ compensation case.
The claimant appeals from a Court of Appeals’ decision holding that the circuit court was without authority to require the State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) to pay attorney fees in addition to the amount previously ordered by the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) and approved by the Court of Appeals on review. Short v. SAIF,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shoulders v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Greenslitt v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Cavins v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Ohlig v. FMC Marine & Rail Equipment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Grudle v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Greenslitt v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- SAIF Corp. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Howard v. Willamette PoultryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.