Legal Opinion
Toth v. Arason
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 12, 2006No. A04-769Published
1Opinion of the Court
722 N.W.2d 437 (2006)
David H. TOTH, Appellant,
v.
Gerald ARASON, Individually, and d/b/a Arason's Body Shop, Respondent.
No. A04-769.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
October 12, 2006.
Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, Lyndon F. Larsen, International Falls, MN, for Appellant.
Steven A. Nelson, International Falls, MN, for Respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
Appellant David Toth sued respondent Gerald Arason individually and d/b/a Arason's Body Shop for breach of contract, deceptive trade practices, and violations of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.