Legal Opinion
Dandini v. Dandini
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1948No. Civ. No. 13653PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The plaintiff, Lillian R. Dandini, and the defendant, A. 0. Dandini, were married in 1932. In 1946, plaintiff secured a decree of separate maintenance, and an award of $150 per month. Subsequently, defendant, while in arrears in his payments on this' award, secured a Nevada divorce from plaintiff, and was contemplating remarriage. Plaintiff thereupon secured a default judgment against defendant, determining that the Nevada divorce was void and of no legal effect, and enjoining defendant from marrying any other person. Over two months after such judgment had been secured, the defendant moved…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In Re the Estate of HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Dandini v. DandiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- In Re Marriage of LeffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Dandini v. DandiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Coleman v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949