Fisher & Van Gilder v. First Trust Joint Stock Land Bank
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.
The sole question presented for decision is whether jurisdiction of the defendant was acquired by the service of the original notice on the vice president of the defendant Federal corporation in Chicago, Illinois, the domicile of the corporation, under its charter, granted by an act of Congress. It is admitted that the defendant Joint Stock Land Bank had its principal place of business in Chicago, had no agent, representative, or office in the state of Iowa, and had been engaged, and had the right to be engaged, in business, under the provisions of its charter, in the state of Iowa. One…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kurilla Ex Rel. Kurilla v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Elk River Coal & Lumber Co. v. FunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. RubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Elwert v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1956
- Harris v. American LegionDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.