Montgomery v. Sheldon
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
The state has filed a Motion for Clarification. Ariz.R.Crim.P. 31.18(b). Because the motion and the responses indicate that the opinion may be misconstrued, we grant the motion and clarify the points raised.
First, the state questions requiring the court of appeals to search the record for fundamental error. This, the state alleges, conflicts with Ariz.R.Crim.P. 32.9(c)(l)(ii), which supposedly precludes analysis of issues not presented in the petition for review. Second, the state fears that if a search for fundamental error is required, the opinion could be read as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GortarezArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WhippleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Wilson v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Marilyn Gene Summers v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, Warden Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- State v. KrumArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Resendis-FelixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.