Attorney Grievance Commission v. Saul
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
Before us in this case is the question of what sanction should be imposed upon a member of the Maryland Bar who, in 1994, was suspended from the practice of law in Virginia after being convicted of bank fraud by a federal district court sitting in that state.
I
For twenty years prior to his suspension, Ira Saul practiced law in Fairfax, Virginia. He was also licensed to practice in *260the District of Columbia1 and in Maryland but did not have an active practice in either of those jurisdictions.
At the end of 1989, Saul was retained by Carter Boehm, a Northern Virginia real estate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CasalinoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SparrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.