Work v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
This is an appeal under section 250 of the Judicial Code, par. 6, from, a writ of mandamus compelling the Secretary of the Interior to consider and allow a claim of the ,Ches-tatee Pyrites & Chemical Corporation, under section 5 of the Dent Act. It presents questions very similar to those heard in Work v. United States ex rel. Rives, just decided, ante, p. 175.
The relator owned a pyrites mine before the war. In compliance with the request of the Government to enlarge its plant to meet the war necessities, it borrowed the sum of $695,000, on which it obligated itself to pay interest at the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wilbur v. U. S. Ex Rel. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ickes v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Creager v. P. F. Collier & Son Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929
- United States ex rel. Jarman v. WorkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Grover v. Merritt Development Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.