Legal Opinion

Work v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1925No. 401PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

This is an appeal under section 250 of the Judicial Code, par. 6, from, a writ of mandamus compelling the Secretary of the Interior to consider and allow a claim of the ,Ches-tatee Pyrites & Chemical Corporation, under section 5 of the Dent Act. It presents questions very similar to those heard in Work v. United States ex rel. Rives, just decided, ante, p. 175.

The relator owned a pyrites mine before the war. In compliance with the request of the Government to enlarge its plant to meet the war necessities, it borrowed the sum of $695,000, on which it obligated itself to pay interest at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. U. S. Ex Rel. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ickes v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Creager v. P. F. Collier & Son Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929
  4. United States ex rel. Jarman v. WorkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  5. Grover v. Merritt Development Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API