Legal Opinion
Ickes v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 29, 1933No. 767PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr! Justice Brandéis
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The claim of the Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corporation for compensation under the War Minerals Relief Act, March 2, 1919, c. 94, § 5, 40 Stat. 1272, 1274, is here' for the fourth time. Before the World War the company owned a pyrites mine. In 1918, it made extensive enlargements of its plant at the request of the Secretary of the Interior. As hostilities ceased soon thereafter, the undertaking resulted in a large loss. Prior to 1922, it made applications for relief'from the losses suffered. These applications resulted in awards…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wilbur v. U. S. Ex Rel. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States ex rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp. v. WilburCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Abramson v. HardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- United States v. 23 7/12 Dozen Bottles, 35-Cent Size, & 12⅔ Dozen Bottles, 70-Cent Size, of an Article of Drugs Labeled in Part "Lee's Save the Baby"District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Aberly v. Craven CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Nelson v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.