Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Jarman v. Work

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 4, 1926No. 4366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellant, plaintiff belqw, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel defendant, Secretary of the Interior, to allow certain claims alleged to be due the plaintiff under War Minerals Relief Act of March 2, 1919, 40 Stat. 1272, § 5, as amended by the Act of November 23, 1921, 42 Stat. 322 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 311514/15e).

It appears that during the month of June, 1918, and prior thereto, relator was operating a chrome property in California. It is alleged that the operations lyere being carried on “by reason of a request by the Department of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Work v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hines v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
  2. United States ex rel. Carpy v. WorkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  3. Work v. Crimora Manganese Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API