Legal Opinion

Grover v. Merritt Development Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 27, 1942No. 197PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The War Minerals Relief Act was passed on March 2, 1919. Its principal object was “to relieve persons and companies who had been invited by the government to invest money in the production or preparation for the production of certain metals or materials for use in the war, and who had incurred expense and suffered losses because of the armistice, and the lack of market for such products.” Ickes v. Cuyuna Mining & Investment Co., 63 App.D.C. 91, 69 F.2d 662, 663. Section 5 of the Act, 40 Stat. 1272, 50 U.S.C.A. § 80 note, provides in part:

"That the Secretary of 'the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Peck v. HeurichSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Bay Area Painters & Decorators Joint Committee, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1943
  2. Fogarty v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API