Legal Opinion
First State Bank of Gowen v. Miller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 26, 1925No. 13095PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHACKELFORD, C.
The p’aiw-i tiff in error was the plaintiff below, and the defendant in error was the defendant. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.
The cause was tried upon the plaintiff’s amended petition. The -plaintiff, by its amended petition, seeks to recover from the defendant the sum of 8600 and accrued and accruing interest, upon a promissory note made by defendant, payable to plaintiff, and for .a reasonable attorney fee in the sum of $100, as provided in tbe note. It is alleged further, that as collateral…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First National Bank of Poteau v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. GinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Holt v. Aetna Bldg. Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Oilton State Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- First Nat. Bank of Maud v. McKownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hogue v. McClain County Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Harris v. SnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Jones v. American Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Charleston Hill National Mines, Inc. v. CloughNevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Charleston Hill National Mines, Inc. v. CloughNevada Supreme Court · 1963