Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Maud v. McKown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1918No. 8198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; Leander G. Pitman, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Maud, Okla., against Omer McKown and Cora E. McKown. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEWART, C.

The plaintiff filed petition against the defendants, setting up two causes of action on promissory notes made by defendants and secured by mortgages on real estate belonging to the defendants. The answer of defendants admits the execution of the notes and mortgages, sets up failure of consideration, and alleges that said notes and mortgages were made to Minnie H. Davis, a clerk of R. J. Edwards, president of the plaintiff bank, without consideration, and by the said Minnie H. Davis assigned to- the bank without consideration ; that the notes and mortgages were made in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Stephens v. OverstolzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1890
  4. City Nat. Bank of Mangum v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noble v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. McLain v. Oklahoma Cotton Growers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. First State Bank of Gowen v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API