People v. Walker
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, C. J.
The primary question at issue on this appeal is whether a defendant must personally use a firearm in the commission of a charged felony if he is to be subjected to the increased penalties *236provided by Penal Code section 12022.5.1 We answer that question in the affirmative but as defendant was sentenced to a life term by virtue of the conviction of the charged offense, such term cannot be increased because of his use of a firearm in the commission of the charged crime.
Defendant John Earl Walker and Cindy Lou Young were charged with murder (§ 187); only defendant is alleged…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- People v. BeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. AvenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.