Legal Opinion
Claim of Ecret v. Holiday Inn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 10, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 13, 1997, which ruled that claimant’s application for workers’ compensation benefits was time barred.
*917In November 1990, claimant was injured while she was working as a chambermaid for Holiday Inn (hereinafter the employer) when she slipped and fell in the employer’s parking lot. In January 1995, claimant filed an application for workers’ compensation benefits. At the first hearing on her claim, the employer argued that the claim was not timely filed. The Workers’ Compensation Law Judge dismissed the claim as untimely and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Claim of Loiacono v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Romano v. Franklin General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Claim of Kaszas v. Monticello Central SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Moore v. Oneida, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Artiste v. Kingsbrook Jewish Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schneider v. Dunkirk Ice CreamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Kaschak v. IBM Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998