Legal Opinion

Claim of Kaszas v. Monticello Central School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 21, 1974, which found that the claim for compensation was not barred by section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law because the employer made advance payment of compensation. On this appeal, appellants claim that the appellant-employer did not continue payment of the claimant’s wages or provide medical services under circumstances which constitute an advance payment of compensation under section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The claimant, a school teacher employed by appellant, Monticello Central School…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Rivard v. New York State Police State CampusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Claim of Elenz v. American Machine & FoundryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claim of Loiacono v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Maxey v. Fremont Department of UtilitiesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. McLaughlin v. Ludlow Valve Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Claim of Ecret v. Holiday InnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API