Schneider v. Dunkirk Ice Cream
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 13, 2001, which ruled that Liberty Mutual Insurance Company is responsible for claimant’s 1996 claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
Claimant was a truck driver for Dunkirk Ice Cream (hereinafter the employer) when, on October 6, 1993, he sustained a work-related injury to his back (hereinafter the 1993 accident). A C-2 report of injury was filed, and the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, paid for claimant’s medical expenses which consisted of chiropractic care for his lower back…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hayden v. S & W Meat & PoultryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Claim of Druziak v. Town of AmsterdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Claim of Schultz v. Voltro Distributors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Claim of Kaschak v. IBM Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Matter of Hamilton v. Village of LynbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of Johnson v. Adams & AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Hernandez v. Guardian Purchasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Petitt v. Eaton & Van WinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Zucker v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Henness v. Price Chopper/Golub Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.