Legal Opinion

In re Meeker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 2016No. 02-16-00103-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, CHIEF JUSTICE

In this original proceeding,1 relators Wade Meeker, James Meeker, Barney Holland, as independent executor of the estate of Lawrence H. Meeker, and Natasha Wesson seek a writ of mandamus to compel respondent the Honorable Joe Loving to withdraw his February 24, 2016 “Order Granting Verified Rule 202 Petition and Intervention for Deposition and Subpoena Duces Tecum to Investigate Potential Claims.” We deny relief in part and conditionally grant relief in part.

Relators contend that respondent abused his discretion by granting relief under a petition for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Carle v. CarleTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Trevino v. TurcotteTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re WolfeTexas Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. in the Estate of Terrance Stephen Daniels, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019
  2. In Re Acclarent, Inc. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
  3. in the Estate of Dempsey JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API