Legal Opinion

In Re Wolfe

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2011No. 10-0294PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Per curiam

“Individual citizens ... have no right to maintain an ouster suit without being joined by a proper state official.” Garcia v. Laughlin, 155 Tex. 261, 285 S.W.2d 191, 194 (1955) (orig.proceeding) (writ denied on other grounds). The question in this mandamus proceeding is whether, without joinder of a proper state official, individual citizens may obtain pre-suit discovery under Rule 202, Tex.R. Civ. P., to investigate grounds for removal of a county official. We answer no and conditionally grant relief.

The Harris County Department of Education and four of its seven trustees, Angie Chestnut,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Garcia v. LaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Office Employees International Union Local 277 v. Southwestern Drug Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Dishman v. GaryTexas Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. In re ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. in Re Mike East, Alice East, Lisa East and Alejandro Urias, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
  3. Patton Boggs LLP v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. in Re City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In re DePinhoTexas Supreme Court · 2016

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API