Legal Opinion

Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Lapidus

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Defendant has made two motions in this action, one for an order directing a further bill of particulars, and the other for an examination before trial of the plaintiffs or their agents and employees.

The demand for a bill of particulars appears to have been fairly complied with, and the motion for a further bill is denied without costs.

The motion for an examination of the plaintiffs before trial would, under the decisions in this department, ordinarily be granted. The State Insurance Fund, however, is an agency of the State (Sadigur v. State of New York, 173 Misc. 645), and it is not a public…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sadigur v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ciulla v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Skakandy v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Methodist Hospital of Brooklyn v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. State Insurance Fund v. BoylandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. De Campos v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API