Legal Opinion
Ciulla v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided March 9, 1948No. Claim No. 28247PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
An order was heretofore made herein directing the State of New York to submit to an examination before trial, by certain employees including one designated as James E. Ingraham. It now develops that claimants in reality seek to examine a James H. England, in the employ of the New York City housing authority. The Attorney-General has accordingly moved to modify the original order to strike out that portion which directs the examination of James E. Ingraham (correctly known as James H. England) as an agent or employee of the State. In opposition thereto, claimants’ counsel urges that the New…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Niagara Falls Power Co. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Pantess v. Saratoga Springs AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Breen v. Mortgage CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Pauchogue Land Corp. v. Long Island State Park CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Bass v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Marino v. Town of RamapoNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. Parking Authority of the City of TrentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Tumulty v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.