Legal Opinion
Behunin v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 29, 1986No. Civ. A. 86-K-281, 86-K-331, 86-K-526, 86-K-680, 86-K-1178, 86-K-1234, 86-K-1900 and 86-K-2566PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions seek damages arising from the manufacture and marketing of a product called Sarabond. Sarabond was designed to increase the bond strength between brick and mortar. The product, however, allegedly corrodes metal materials used in construction.
Many claims for relief have been alleged. They include strict liability in tort, breach of warranty, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, breach of continuing duty to warn, punitive damages, and treble damages under various provisions of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Northern Trust Bank/O'hare, N.A. v. Inryco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Rick Morgan v. City of Rawlins and Abe DeherreraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Dolton v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maestas v. State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Klein v. GrynbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- People v. ChausseeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Klein v. GrynbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Seidl v. Greentree Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.