Legal Opinion

Dolton v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1981No. 80CA1043PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment entered for defendants, asserting that the trial court erred in concluding there was no legal basis for its claims for tortious interference with contractual relations and prospective business advantage and breach of fiduciary duty. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiff L. L. Dolton is a real estate developer. Defendants are Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Association, a lender; First Capitol Corporation, a subsidiary of Capitol Federal engaged in the business of real estate development; and Richard D. Heiser-man, senior…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Peterson v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Milohnich v. First National Bank of Miami SpringsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Comtrol, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & T. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Amoco Oil Co. v. ErvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dodd Insurance Services, Inc. And Tom Dodd, Jr. v. Royal Insurance Company of America, an Illinois Corporation F/k/a Royal-Globe Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API