Legal Opinion
Klein v. Grynberg
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 19, 1995No. Nos. 92-1232, 92-1233PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSZKOWSKI, Senior District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered by the District Court of Colorado. The suit arose out of a contract between the parties to develop and market a computer software security system invented by the plaintiffs. Following a jury trial in which the plaintiffs essentially prevailed, the District Court struck much of the *1500award and entered judgment as a matter of law for defendants. For the reasons that follow, we affirm that judgment in part and reverse in part.
Background
The story of this litigation begins over ten years ago when…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Mitchell v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Mitchell v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Speakers of Sport, Inc. v. Proserv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Bowden v. Caldor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.