Legal Opinion
Abney Mills v. Tri-State Motor Transit Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 23, 1965No. 281PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Plaintiff requested Judge Walker in writing to make certain findings of fact and conclusions of law. It assigns as error the judge’s refusal to make the fifth finding of fact requested by it, which reads:
“5. On or about September 28, 1960, the defendant, Tri-State Motor Transit Company, through its duly authorized agent, to-wit: its President, assumed complete management and control of Kilgo Motor Freight, Inc., and through its said agent, entered into and remained within the State of North Carolina for this purpose until on or about May 1, 1961, pursuant to the contract referred to, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Groel v. United Electric Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Clover Leaf Freight Lines, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Wholesalers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Lambert v. SchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jake Harold Bowman, Philip G. Griffin, A. Donald Brinton and Midland Industries, Inc. v. Curt G. Joa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Ash v. Burnham Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Moore v. McKibbon Bros., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1998
- Yarborough v. Schoolfield Furniture Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Curd v. WinecoffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.