Legal Opinion

Curd v. Winecoff

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1988No. 8719DC535PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Plaintiff filed suit in February 1986 to acquire title to defendants’ property by adverse possession.

In her complaint, plaintiff alleged she and her predecessors in title had constructed buildings on and fenced in 3.276 acres owned by defendants lying east of a line between points 187 and 273 as shown on a map introduced at trial. Plaintiff further alleged that the use of this property had been open, notorious, hostile, adverse and continuous for more than twenty years. Defendants denied plaintiffs material allegations and counterclaimed for a permanent easement over plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Potts v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Security National Bank of Greensboro v. Educators Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Wilson County Board of Education v. LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beam v. KerleeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Merrick v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Woodring v. SwieterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Lancaster v. Maple Street Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Tedder v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API