Thomas v. State

delivered, the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted of the violation of chapter 49 of the (so-called) Private Acts of 1911. He has appealed and assigned errors. ■The statute reads as follows:

*49“An act entitled an aet to prevent live stock from running at large in counties in this State having a population of not less than 13,500 and not over 13,640 according to the federal census of 1910 or according to any subsequent federal census, and to prevent the necessity of fencing lands in counties that are now affected by this act and that may hereafter be affected by…