Legal Opinion

Sutton v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1896PublishedCited by 39 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Criminal Court of Shelby County, L. P. Cooper, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Joe Sutton was indicted and convicted in the Criminal Court of Shelby County for unlawfully and knowingly permitting his live stock to run at large, in violation of what is known, popularly, as the ‘ ‘ no-fence law, ’ ’ the same being *698Ch. 182 of the Acts of 1895. He was fined twenty-five dollars, and has appealed in error.

The - indictment is in good form, and the proof is plenary; hut the contention is made, on behalf of the plaintiff .in error, that the statute is unconstitutional, and, consequently, that his motion to quash the indictment, and then his motion in arrest of judgment, should…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State v. AlstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Demoville & Co. v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Price Peck v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Astor v. Schlitz Brewing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Martin's Executors v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  5. Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API